Considering the many challenges of passive crossover design, many DIY enthusiasts are running their speakers actively. The advantages are compelling:
- ease of tweaking and making changes
- far more powerful and advanced filtering and EQ options to precisely control the response
- freedom from impedance and tolerance issues
- much greater efficiency in using power
- freedom to use low power amps such as valves and class A
- cleaner sound at high output
Update: How do they sound?
In a recent series of listening tests, I had a chance to compare four different active options in two systems. Some of the results were surprising.
Active crossover listening tests >
Analogue vs digital
Siegfried Linkwitz uses analogue active filters in his speakers. The advantage is that no digital to analogue conversion is needed, although as the complexity of the crossover increases, any sonic intrusions are cumulative. To work in analogue, the crossover must be designed and soldered and this is quite involved. It's a custom solution just like a passive crossover and can't quickly be changed. Working in the digital domain, once the digital to analogue conversion is made, as many filters as the chip allows can be made, including time domain and phase related corrections. Digital crossovers and DSP are far more powerful, and can be quickly and instantly changed without making physical changes to the boards. For this reason DSP is the way of the future. It is possible to construct an entire system where there is only one digital to analogue conversion, in which case DSP becomes even more attractive. It's important to keep in mind that while in the digital domain, changes can occur that impact on sound quality.
DCX: a bells and whistles crossover
The first choice for many is Behringer. Ultradrive DCX2496 and Ultracurve DEQ2496.
These are low cost and powerful options. Ultradrive has 6 channels, allowing stereo 3 way or 2 way for mains and centre in a surround application. Each channel has many different EQ options. Ultracurve is a dedicated EQ unit with much more powerful EQ options. It can be used for response shaping and is powerful enough for EQ that deals with room modes. Ultradrive doesn't have enough EQ processing for difficult room modes.
Ultradrive is used by Emerald Physics in their highly regarded speakers using waveguides and pro drivers. BESL use Ultradrive in their speaker development process, and supply it for use with their speakers.
One of the very attractive features of DCX is digital delays. Each channel can be time-aligned. There is an auto-align feature that calculates the required delay. The delays assigned are not neceesarily what you might expect, and might not correspond to physical driver offsets. If you sit closer to one speaker, you can also correct for this. This feature can have a dramatic impact on imaging.
These units use servo balancing which is necessary for professional use but not for home use. As a result, in the home noise is introduced into the signal chain and it would be better to have unbalanced lines. The power supply is also noisy switchmode. Some have argued that the DAC isn't the best quality. As a result of these downsides, many different upgrades are available, many of them costing more than buying the unit itself. The ability to upgrade does make it more desirable.
Having used both units I can say that you can get a very good result with them and that they can improve most systems. However, for a refined and high end system correctly set up in a dedicated room, I'd suggest something better is warranted.
DEQX: an advanced and complete option
For a serious high end system, the premium choice appears to be DEQX. The cost is much higher than Behringer, but it is more powerful and has been designed for high end systems, taking an input from a digital transport (CD/DVD/Blu-ray digital output) and also including a high end DAC and multi channel preamp. It has a remote unlike the Behringer units and very steep slopes as well as phase correction so that no time domain abberations are introduced.
DEQX is used by Legend Speakers in their top of the range active speaker Legend Tikandi. They also use it in their Big Red (Kumbar Wirri) speaker, which is available active and passive and the difference is described by Ed Kramer in a 6 Moons review, on the second page.
Hypex: a built-in system
Hypex have created a built in system that uses a plate amp module for each speaker and digital active crossover which is set up by PC. Simply run an output from your preamp into the plate amplifier built in to the speaker. This eliminates amplifiers in your AV rack and gives a nice neat solution.
Hypex AS2.100 >
This is similar to the solution used by Australian custom speaker manufacturer Aslan Acoustics in their R1 and R3 Reference speakers. Combined with their music server, you have a complete system with just two components. For surround sound you just need more power amps and surround speakers.
DIY analogue options
For those inclined to get into DIY, a good analogue solution is found at Elliot Sound Products. A PCB is supplied with instructions for a 3 way active analogue crossover. It's important to keep in mind, however, that this type of active crossover simply uses textbook LR filters. My experience has been that a well designed passive crossover is better because more sophisticated filtering is needed. The other options are more powerful in that regard. I currently have a similar active crossover that I don't use as it wasn't an improvement over the passive crossover. The slopes and crossover points are all fixed by the components and multiple changes damage the PCB tracks.
MiniDSP: low cost and flexible
A very appealing new option is now available - MiniDSP. They supply fully assembled DSP modules that can act as an active crossover and EQ unit at a very low price. You simply need to put together a power supply, which can be as simple as a plugpack, then mount it in a case. Digital I/O modules are available and each one has 4 channels to allow for stereo 2 way or 4 way for one channel. Essentially this has the same functions as the Behringer units at a much lower cost without the issues related to balanced lines and the power supply. The settings are configured with a PC.
MiniDSP now provide a plug and play solution and the cost increase is minor. In fact if you purchased a box and connectors it would probably cost you more.
One of the key features of MiniDSP is it's flexibility. Do you want to use your own DAC? The board is designed to allow this and many other options you would often not have.
Allocator: a PC based powerful crossover
Another powerful solution is PC software based DSP and crossovers. One good option is the Frequency Allocator at Thuneau.com.
It is an 8 channel option that requires a good quality 8 channel sound card. The software itself is cheap, and the solution is made more affordable if using an existing PC, but the cost of the sound card should also be considered. In order to get the most out of it, most users will need to upgrade their sound card.
How does it compare to the other options? In terms of features and performance, it seems to be comparable to DEQX. It allows up to 8 channels and so it can be used for stereo 4 way and it also can perform phase correction unlike MiniDSP and Behringer DCX. It can be used also in a surround system, although this means using the Lite version and running multiple instances. Phase correct isn't included in that case. For those who want to also use their system for 2 channel, it might make sense to run the full version for the mains and use MiniDSP for the surrounds.
There are many other benefits in using a PC in the sound system. It can perform the functions of a PVR and stream downloaded audio and video content. A PC can be a good platform for storing and playback. In many cases the cost of a PC solution is far less than stand alone components. For many, however it comes down to the question of whether you want a PC in your sound system and if you can get past the idea that surely the sound quality from a PC can't be "high end."
CAD Audio active modules
This option was pointed out in my other active options page.
CAD Audio DSP modules >
I won't comment just yet as I haven't had a chance to investigate this option, but it does appear promising.
Next: which active option is right for me? >
Active crossover listening tests >
1. You mention downsides of the Behringer DEQ2496 being: "These units use servo balancing which is necessary for professional use but not for home use. As a result, in the home noise is introduced into the signal chain and it would be better to have unbalanced lines. The power supply is also noisy switchmode. "ReplyDelete
What does this actually mean for sound quality? Do you mean the speakers will hum due to the noise? Do you mean if we used a balanced to unbalanced adapter the problem will go away?
2. So essentially I can use the Behringer DEQ2496 as a processor/preamp? i.e receives digital SPDIF PCM signal from the pc, processes and output analog to the amplifier?
3. With the Thuneau.com software based equaliser (or any other software based equaliser) can I use it if I am outputting digital PCM via optical? That way I can equalise on the PC and use my current receiver/DAC to do the processing?
4. If the answer to question 3 is Yes, apart from convenience what are the disadvantages of the software based method over a hardware based equaliser like the Behringer DEQ2496?
Simon, whoa! Let me see if I can cover it all.ReplyDelete
1. Hum is a separate issue. Noise here refers to the sound that you hear when no source signal is present, similar to pink noise. All electronics components have a noise floor and will add noise to some degree. Obviously we would like as little as possible and efficient speakers will suffer more. Noise can be a problem during quiet parts of a movie or soft level music, but in most systems you should not notice any problem. I believe that the balanced circuits used in DCX will increase the noise and there is nothing you can do about it. I currently use a digital link between DEQ and DCX and noise is not a problem, but if I use analogue inputs between them, there is a substantial increase in noise.
2. You could use it as a DAC but I suspect you could buy a better DAC for the price if that is what you are looking for. It is not a preamp.
3. That would depend on your sound card. You would need multiple digital outputs and I don't like your chances of finding something that will do what you want. MiniDSP better suits this kind of application I suspect, but you would need to get into some electronics DIY in order to get digital outputs into your DAC.
4. Many don't want a PC in their system. PCs also can have noise issues.
Here is another DSP XO solution you can add to your blog:
I have not used that unit, but it does look promising. Currently I use Allocator on a PC based system. BTW my PC is dead quiet, you have put your ear up to the chassis to hear any fans, and most PCs can be cheaply modified to achieve similar results. PCs are the way to go for high quality audio IMHO. I would like to see how many "Hi End" source devices have less than .001% THD, my sound card does, and that includes the mic preamp used during loopback testing. Even the DEQX is limited compared to a VST based PC solution.
Cheers DSP XOers,
I used to use the Behringer DCD2496 quite a bit but only for systems that I could EQ to a LR24 function. With Thuneau Allocator you get variable Q filters and a fair amount of powerful shelving and parametric EQ functions. I modded the DEQX to have a totally passive cap coupled output stage (which was a major improvement) and modded the digital input for a properly terminated 75ohm SPDIF, and even then - I find the Allocator/Arbitrator combo with a decent sound card makes the Behringer DCX a bit of a waste of time. It's handy - the DCX, and for some apps it works well. But for really nitty gritty systems when you want proper transfer functions for a predetermined acoustic response, Allocator is the way to go. Allocator, with the right hardware (and the right end user) can result in top shelf CD player sound - or better.ReplyDelete
Another PC solution is acourate (www.acourate.com). It is only software for calculating crossovers and room correction (includes a 2 channel convolver). Many users have built small and cheap linux PCs to operate as atand alone units.ReplyDelete
Effectively this is similar to DEQX, but it is much more flexible, much less automated and much more powerful (slightly less expensive when include cost of sound card)
You seem to be unfairly critical of the DCX2496 in regards to sound quality but if everything is done in the digital domain and then sent to an external DAC such as Sabre ES9018, then surely this would be a very good setup.ReplyDelete
Could you comment further
In listening tests DCX performed well, so it is not that I'm uncritical of DCX. In listening tests, a small group had a lot of trouble finding any difference between the stock and modded units.ReplyDelete
Let me put it this way. You would want to get your system and room well sorted before putting too much emphasis on improving DCX.